Brazeal v. State

128 S.E. 437, 34 Ga. App. 171, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 112
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 20, 1925·No. 16463·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; the verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. W. A. Dampler, for plaintiff- in error. Fred Kea, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brazeal v. State, 128 S.E. 437, 34 Ga. App. 171, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 112 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

128 S.E. 437 (Brazeal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.