Brayton v. Town

12 Iowa 346
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided December 3, 1861·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Baldwin, J.

Under the provision of § 411, the sheriff is made responsible for the acts of his deputy. Where money has been collected by a deputy sheriff, upon an execution, and he refuses or neglects to pay over the same, the remedy is upon the bond of the sheriff, and not against the deputy and his sureties. The appointment of a deputy must be in writing, and approved by the officer who approves the bond of the principal; and the appointment thus endorsed, is to be filed in the office of the county judge. This seems to be required for the purpose of letting the public know who is authorized to act as such deputy. The bond of the deputy [348] is to be given to the sheriff, and need not be filed or approved, but is for the protection of the sheriff and his sureties.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brayton v. Town, 12 Iowa 346 (iowa 1861).

12 Iowa 346 (Brayton v. Town) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Drake v. Keeling
299 N.W. 919 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1941)
City of Duluth v. Ross
167 N.W. 485 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1918)
Rehmel v. Board of Supervisors
154 N.W. 596 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1915)
Headington v. Langland
21 N.W. 650 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1884)