Brayden Scott Roupp v. the State of Texas

Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)

Brayden Scott Roupp v. the State of Texas

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

DecidedMarch 19, 2026

Docket11-25-00285-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Brayden Scott Roupp v. the State of Texas (Brayden Scott Roupp v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brayden Scott Roupp v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion filed March 19, 2026

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-25-00285-CR ___________

BRAYDEN SCOTT ROUPP, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 70th District Court Ector County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. A241142CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION A jury convicted Appellant, Brayden Scott Roupp, of the first-degree felony offense of murder and assessed his punishment at life imprisonment in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 19.02(b), (c) (West Supp 2025). The trial court sentenced him accordingly. Appellant filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s judgment. Appellant has now filed a motion to “[w]ithdraw” his appeal. In the motion, Appellant states that he “does not desire to appeal the verdict of guilt or the sentencing by the jury.” He states that his attorney “has advised [him] that once he withdraws his right to appeal, he will no longer have the opportunity to do so[,] and in full understanding, [Appellant] does desire to [w]ithdraw his [a]ppeal.” We construe Appellant’s motion as a request to dismiss his appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). The motion is signed by Appellant and Appellant’s attorney in compliance with Rule 42.2(a). Id. We grant Appellant’s motion and dismiss this appeal.

W. STACY TROTTER JUSTICE

March 19, 2026 Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion filed March 19, 2026

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-25-00285-CR ___________

BRAYDEN SCOTT ROUPP, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 70th District Court Ector County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. A241142CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION A jury convicted Appellant, Brayden Scott Roupp, of the first-degree felony offense of murder and assessed his punishment at life imprisonment in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 19.02(b), (c) (West Supp 2025). The trial court sentenced him accordingly. Appellant filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s judgment. Appellant has now filed a motion to “[w]ithdraw” his appeal. In the motion, Appellant states that he “does not desire to appeal the verdict of guilt or the sentencing by the jury.” He states that his attorney “has advised [him] that once he withdraws his right to appeal, he will no longer have the opportunity to do so[,] and in full understanding, [Appellant] does desire to [w]ithdraw his [a]ppeal.” We construe Appellant’s motion as a request to dismiss his appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). The motion is signed by Appellant and Appellant’s attorney in compliance with Rule 42.2(a). Id. We grant Appellant’s motion and dismiss this appeal.

W. STACY TROTTER JUSTICE

March 19, 2026 Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Brayden Scott Roupp v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brayden-scott-roupp-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp11-2026.