Brayan Oliver Melchor v. State
Opinion
NUMBER 13-19-00414-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
BRAYAN OLIVER MELCHOR, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 430th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.
ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina Order Per Curiam
This appeal is before the Court on appellant’s motion to supplement the record to
include State’s Disclosures Under Brady v. Maryland and the Michael Morton Act as well
as judgments from co-defendant’s criminal cases
When a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk’s record, the appellate court may by letter direct the trial court clerk to prepare, certify, and file in the appellate court a
supplemental clerk’s record containing the omitted item or items. See TEX. R. APP. P.
34.5(c)(1). Accordingly, the motion to supplement is hereby GRANTED and this appeal
is ABATED.
The trial court clerk of the 430th District Court of Hidalgo County is directed to
prepare a supplemental appellate record in this case to include the State’s Disclosures
filed on September 11, 2019. The 430th District Court of Hidalgo County is further
directed to make findings whether the judgments for the related judgments requested in
appellant’s motion are relevant and necessary for purposes of this appeal. The
supplemental record shall be filed with this Court within 30 days from the date of this
order.
It is further ordered, this appeal will be reinstated upon receipt of the supplemental
clerk record, and Appellant’s brief is due sixty days after the supplemental record is filed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 24th day of February, 2020.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brayan Oliver Melchor v. State (Brayan Oliver Melchor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.