Bray v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Bray v. State

1930 OK CR 463, 292 P. 1061, 49 Okla. Crim. 48, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 206

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 8, 1930

DocketNo. A-7504.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 463 (Bray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bray v. State, 1930 OK CR 463, 292 P. 1061, 49 Okla. Crim. 48, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 206 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

*49 EDWARDS, P. J.

The. plaintiff in error was convicted in tbe district court of Caddo county on a charge of manslaughter in the first degree, and was sentenced to serve a term of 10 years in the state penitentiary.

The judgment of conviction was rendered in March, 1929, and the appeal was lodged in this court in August, 1929. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, and no appearance for oral argument was made at the time the case was submitted.

Where an appeal from a conviction for a felony is prosecuted to this court and no briefs in support of it are filed nor oral argument made, this court will not search the record to discover some error upon which to predicate a reversal, but will examine the record for jurisdictional or fundamental errors and to ascertain if the the evidence reasonably supports the verdict and judgment. In this case, we have examined the record with care, and have read closely the testimony. We find no jurisdictional or fundamental errors, and find abundant evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment.

The case is affirmed.

DAVENPORT and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*49 EDWARDS, P. J.

The. plaintiff in error was convicted in tbe district court of Caddo county on a charge of manslaughter in the first degree, and was sentenced to serve a term of 10 years in the state penitentiary.

The judgment of conviction was rendered in March, 1929, and the appeal was lodged in this court in August, 1929. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, and no appearance for oral argument was made at the time the case was submitted.

Where an appeal from a conviction for a felony is prosecuted to this court and no briefs in support of it are filed nor oral argument made, this court will not search the record to discover some error upon which to predicate a reversal, but will examine the record for jurisdictional or fundamental errors and to ascertain if the the evidence reasonably supports the verdict and judgment. In this case, we have examined the record with care, and have read closely the testimony. We find no jurisdictional or fundamental errors, and find abundant evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment.

The case is affirmed.

DAVENPORT and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK CR 463, 292 P. 1061, 49 Okla. Crim. 48, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bray-v-state-oklacrimapp-1930.