Bray v. State

795 So. 2d 1017, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12498, 2001 WL 1008320
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 5, 2001·No. No. 4D01-786·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant petitioner’s request for a belated appeal of the order that summarily denied his postconviction motion. Such relief is required because the order did not advise Bray that he had thirty days to file his notice of appeal. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(g); Vaughn v. State, 654 So.2d 668 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

We find that the trial court was correct in denying Bray’s postconviction motion. The order on appeal is affirmed.

GUNTHER, WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bray v. State, 795 So. 2d 1017, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12498, 2001 WL 1008320 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

795 So. 2d 1017 (Bray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vaughn v. State
654 So. 2d 668 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)