Bray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bray v. State

795 So. 2d 1017, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12498, 2001 WL 1008320

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 5, 2001

DocketNo. 4D01-786

StatusPublished

This text of 795 So. 2d 1017 (Bray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bray v. State, 795 So. 2d 1017, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12498, 2001 WL 1008320 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant petitioner’s request for a belated appeal of the order that summarily denied his postconviction motion. Such relief is required because the order did not advise Bray that he had thirty days to file his notice of appeal. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(g); Vaughn v. State, 654 So.2d 668 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

We find that the trial court was correct in denying Bray’s postconviction motion. The order on appeal is affirmed.

GUNTHER, WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We grant petitioner’s request for a belated appeal of the order that summarily denied his postconviction motion. Such relief is required because the order did not advise Bray that he had thirty days to file his notice of appeal. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(g); Vaughn v. State, 654 So.2d 668 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

We find that the trial court was correct in denying Bray’s postconviction motion. The order on appeal is affirmed.

GUNTHER, WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

795 So. 2d 1017, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12498, 2001 WL 1008320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bray-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack