Bray v. State

289 S.W.3d 455, 375 Ark. 238, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 717
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedDecember 11, 2008
DocketCR 08-1363
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 289 S.W.3d 455 (Bray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bray v. State, 289 S.W.3d 455, 375 Ark. 238, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 717 (Ark. 2008).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Michael J. Bray, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. Based on the petition, however, it appears that petitioner is seeking a writ of certiorari to complete the record pursuant to Rule 3-5 of the Rules of the Supreme Court. But, in his partial record, filed November 21, 2008, petitioner has failed to include any documentation indicating that the transcript was ever ordered from the court reporter, nor has he included any notice of appeal, which is necessary to confer jurisdiction on this court. We therefore have no basis on which to issue the writ. See Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 3-5.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bryant v. State
2019 Ark. 183 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
289 S.W.3d 455, 375 Ark. 238, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bray-v-state-ark-2008.