Bray v. State

289 S.W.3d 455, 375 Ark. 238, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 717
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided December 11, 2008·No. CR 08-1363·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Michael J. Bray, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. Based on the petition, however, it appears that petitioner is seeking a writ of certiorari to complete the record pursuant to Rule 3-5 of the Rules of the Supreme Court. But, in his partial record, filed November 21, 2008, petitioner has failed to include any documentation indicating that the transcript was ever ordered from the court reporter, nor has he included any notice of appeal, which is necessary to confer jurisdiction on this court. We therefore have no basis on which to issue the writ. See Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 3-5.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bray v. State, 289 S.W.3d 455, 375 Ark. 238, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 717 (Ark. 2008).

289 S.W.3d 455 (Bray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bryant v. State
2019 Ark. 183 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2019)