Bray v. Saver

New York Court of Appeals

Bray v. Saver

200 N.E.2d 863, 14 N.Y.2d 920, 252 N.Y.S.2d 322, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1018

DecidedJuly 10, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 200 N.E.2d 863 (Bray v. Saver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bray v. Saver, 200 N.E.2d 863, 14 N.Y.2d 920, 252 N.Y.S.2d 322, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1018 (N.Y. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke and Bergan. Judge Scileppi dissents and votes to modify and to remit to Special Term for recomputation of the judgment as follows: (1) by reducing so much of the recovery under the first cause of action as is represented by the second series of notes; (2) by dismissing the third cause of action; (3) by applying the setoff as found by the Appellate Division against another portion of the recovery, and (4) by recomputing interest.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke and Bergan. Judge Scileppi dissents and votes to modify and to remit to Special Term for recomputation of the judgment as follows: (1) by reducing so much of the recovery under the first cause of action as is represented by the second series of notes; (2) by dismissing the third cause of action; (3) by applying the setoff as found by the Appellate Division against another portion of the recovery, and (4) by recomputing interest.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 N.E.2d 863, 14 N.Y.2d 920, 252 N.Y.S.2d 322, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bray-v-saver-ny-1964.