Bray v. Purple Eagle Entertainment, Inc.

S.D. New York

Bray v. Purple Eagle Entertainment, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 13, 2020·No. 1:18-cv-05205·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

DAVID BRAY, Plaintiff, Docket No: 18-cv-5205 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF DEFENDANT -against- PURPLE EAGLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and RICHARD MGRDECHIAN, Defendants.

nnn KX

Now comes Plaintiff, by and through the undersigned attorney, and respectfully gives notice of the death of the Defendant in this action. Plaintiff has been informed that Defendant Richard Merdechian died on or about August 7", 2020, in New York. Plaintiff’s legal interests and causes of action in this matter remain unaffected by the death of Defendant. Accordingly, Under FRCP 25(a)(1), Plaintiff motions this court for an order of substitution of the deceased Defendant with the Defendant’s estate, or successor(s). Motion to Substitute (ECF No. 117) is WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff shall Respectfully submitted, the Motion to Substitute in accordance ZZ Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a) by Friday, November 20, See Crichlow v. Fischer, No. 12 Civ. 7774 “*imothy C. Parlatore, Esq. 2015 WL 678725, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 17, One World Trade Center, Suite 8500 (denying motion to substitute "without New York, New York 10007 udice to refiling at a later date, for failure to 212-679-6312 the procedure set forth in Rule 25 and Rule 212-202-4787 Facsimile collecting cases). Timothy.parlatore@parlatorelawgroup.com Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close No. 117. | i; A WaT Be 11/12 /9nINn | SARAH L. CA\ E

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

DAVID BRAY, Plaintiff, Docket No: 18-cv-5205 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF DEFENDANT -against- PURPLE EAGLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and RICHARD MGRDECHIAN, Defendants.

nnn KX

Now comes Plaintiff, by and through the undersigned attorney, and respectfully gives notice of the death of the Defendant in this action. Plaintiff has been informed that Defendant Richard Merdechian died on or about August 7", 2020, in New York. Plaintiff’s legal interests and causes of action in this matter remain unaffected by the death of Defendant. Accordingly, Under FRCP 25(a)(1), Plaintiff motions this court for an order of substitution of the deceased Defendant with the Defendant’s estate, or successor(s). Motion to Substitute (ECF No. 117) is WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff shall Respectfully submitted, the Motion to Substitute in accordance ZZ Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a) by Friday, November 20, See Crichlow v. Fischer, No. 12 Civ. 7774 “*imothy C. Parlatore, Esq. 2015 WL 678725, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 17, One World Trade Center, Suite 8500 (denying motion to substitute "without New York, New York 10007 udice to refiling at a later date, for failure to 212-679-6312 the procedure set forth in Rule 25 and Rule 212-202-4787 Facsimile collecting cases). Timothy.parlatore@parlatorelawgroup.com Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close No. 117. | i; A WaT Be 11/12 /9nINn | SARAH L. CA\ E

Bray v. Purple Eagle Entertainment, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Bray v. Purple Eagle Entertainment, Inc. (Bray v. Purple Eagle Entertainment, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.