Bray v. Porterfield & Brown

114 S.E. 86, 29 Ga. App. 135, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 110
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 3, 1922·No. 13231·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bloodwokth, J.

As the motion for a new trial in this ease contains only the usual general grounds, the only question for determination by this court is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. There is some evidence to support the finding of the jury, and a verdict supported by any evidence and approved by the trial judge cannot be set aside by this court because of alleged insufficiency of evidence.” Townsend v. State, 26 Ga. App. 82 (105 S. E. 377).

Judgment affirmed.

.Broyles, O. J., and Luhe, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bray v. Porterfield & Brown, 114 S.E. 86, 29 Ga. App. 135, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 110 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

114 S.E. 86 (Bray v. Porterfield & Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lockard v. Davis
312 S.E.2d 194 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)