Bray v. Porterfield & Brown

114 S.E. 86, 29 Ga. App. 135, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 110
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 3, 1922
Docket13231
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 114 S.E. 86 (Bray v. Porterfield & Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bray v. Porterfield & Brown, 114 S.E. 86, 29 Ga. App. 135, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 110 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Bloodwokth, J.

As the motion for a new trial in this ease contains only the usual general grounds, the only question for determination by this court is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. There is some evidence to support the finding of the jury, and a verdict supported by any evidence and approved by the trial judge cannot be set aside by this court because of alleged insufficiency of evidence.” Townsend v. State, 26 Ga. App. 82 (105 S. E. 377).

Judgment affirmed.

.Broyles, O. J., and Luhe, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lockard v. Davis
312 S.E.2d 194 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 S.E. 86, 29 Ga. App. 135, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bray-v-porterfield-brown-gactapp-1922.