Bray v. Detzner

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bray v. Detzner

99 So. 3d 1290, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19844, 2012 WL 5689272

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 2012·No. No. 1D11-5548·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants raise several challenges to the constitutionality of qualifying fees for unopposed judicial candidates. See § 105.031, Fla. Stat. We reject those arguments. We write to specify that in considering appellants’ equal protection claims under the Florida Constitution, we apply the rational basis test. See Adams v. Askew, 511 F.2d 700 (5th Cir.1975).

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants raise several challenges to the constitutionality of qualifying fees for unopposed judicial candidates. See § 105.031, Fla. Stat. We reject those arguments. We write to specify that in considering appellants’ equal protection claims under the Florida Constitution, we apply the rational basis test. See Adams v. Askew, 511 F.2d 700 (5th Cir.1975).

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Bray v. Detzner, 99 So. 3d 1290, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19844, 2012 WL 5689272 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

99 So. 3d 1290 (Bray v. Detzner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related