Bray v. City Council

39 S.E. 810, 62 S.C. 57, 1901 S.C. LEXIS 10
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided October 7, 1901·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinions

October 7, 1901. This was an application to this Court, in the exercise of its original jurisdiction, for an injunction to restrain the city council of Florence from issuing the bonds mentioned in the petition. After due consideration this Court has reached the conclusion that the said city council has full power to issue the bonds in question.

It is, therefore, ordered, that the temporary injunction heretofore granted be dissolved and that the petition be dismissed.

The reasons for this conclusion will be given in an opinion hereafter to be filed.

October 25, 1901. The reasons for the above judgment are stated by

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bray v. City Council, 39 S.E. 810, 62 S.C. 57, 1901 S.C. LEXIS 10 (S.C. 1901).

39 S.E. 810 (Bray v. City Council) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knight v. Salisbury
206 S.E.2d 875 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1974)
Neel v. Shealy
199 S.E.2d 542 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1973)
Baldwin v. McFadden
109 S.E.2d 579 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1959)
Kalber v. Redfearn
54 S.E.2d 791 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1949)
Davis v. Town of Saluda
145 S.E. 412 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1928)
Lillard v. Melton
87 S.E. 421 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1915)
State Co. v. Jones
82 S.E. 1048 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1914)
Bethea v. Town of Dillon
74 S.E. 983 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1912)
Seegers v. Gibbes
52 S.E. 588 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1905)