Bray v. Church of St. Brandon

40 N.W. 518, 39 Minn. 390, 1888 Minn. LEXIS 135
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided November 16, 1888·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Dickinson, J.

This action having been commenced by the service of the summons upon the treasurer of the defendant, a religious corporation, the defendant made no appearance, and judgment was entered by default. Upon a motion, based upon affidavits going to excuse the default, the court set aside the judgment, and allowed an answer to be interposed, upon the payment of costs. This appeal is from that order. The case justified the discretionary order appealed from. The application was seasonably made. A good defence was shown. The person upon whom the summons was served did not inform any other member of the corporation of that fact. Circumstances were shown indicating that he would be personally benefited by the plaintiff’s recovery in this action. It was within the discretionary power of the court to relieve the defendant from the consequences of such negligence or intentional omission of duty on the [391]*391part of one of its officers. There is no reason to suppose that the plaintiff has suffered any prejudice except that he is required to try the action.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bray v. Church of St. Brandon, 40 N.W. 518, 39 Minn. 390, 1888 Minn. LEXIS 135 (Mich. 1888).

40 N.W. 518 (Bray v. Church of St. Brandon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodgers v. United States & Dominion Life Insurance
149 N.W. 671 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1914)
White v. Gurney
99 N.W. 889 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1904)
J. H. Queal & Co. v. Bulen
95 N.W. 310 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1903)