Bray v. Centimark Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bray v. Centimark Corp.

560 S.W.3d 622

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 30, 2018

DocketNo. ED 106361

StatusPublished

This text of 560 S.W.3d 622 (Bray v. Centimark Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bray v. Centimark Corp., 560 S.W.3d 622 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

CentiMark Corporation ("Employer") appeals from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission") denying its motion under Section 287.470 to review the permanent and total disability award that the Commission previously entered in favor of William Bray ("Employee"), its former employee. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CentiMark Corporation ("Employer") appeals from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission") denying its motion under Section 287.470 to review the permanent and total disability award that the Commission previously entered in favor of William Bray ("Employee"), its former employee. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

560 S.W.3d 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bray-v-centimark-corp-moctapp-2018.