Braxton v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Braxton v. United States

50 F. App'x 611

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 7, 2002·No. No. 02-6815·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Savino Braxton appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Braxton’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Braxton v. United States, No. CA-02-1197-JFM (D.Md. May 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Savino Braxton appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Braxton’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Braxton v. United States, No. CA-02-1197-JFM (D.Md. May 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Braxton v. United States, 50 F. App'x 611 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

50 F. App'x 611 (Braxton v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.