Braxton v. United States
This text of Braxton v. United States (Braxton v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6815
SAVINO BRAXTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA- 02-1197-JFM)
Submitted: October 15, 2002 Decided: November 7, 2002
Before LUTTIG and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Savino Braxton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Savino Braxton appeals the district court’s order denying his
petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we grant Braxton’s motion for leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Braxton v. United States, No. CA-02-1197-JFM (D. Md. May 6, 2002).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Braxton v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braxton-v-united-states-ca4-2002.