Braxton v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 7, 2002
Docket02-6815
StatusUnpublished

This text of Braxton v. United States (Braxton v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Braxton v. United States, (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6815

SAVINO BRAXTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA- 02-1197-JFM)

Submitted: October 15, 2002 Decided: November 7, 2002

Before LUTTIG and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Savino Braxton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Savino Braxton appeals the district court’s order denying his

petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we grant Braxton’s motion for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Braxton v. United States, No. CA-02-1197-JFM (D. Md. May 6, 2002).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Braxton v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braxton-v-united-states-ca4-2002.