Braxton v. Stokes

District Court, S.D. Alabama·Decided July 23, 2024·No. 2:23-cv-00127·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Patrick Braxton, et al.,

Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:23-CV-00127-KD-N

vs.

Town of Newbern,

Defendant.

ORDER ON STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiffs Patrick Braxton, James Ballard, Barbara Patrick, Janice Quarles, Wanda Scott, and Dorothy Holley and Defendant Town of Newbern (collectively, the “Parties”) have resolved this case. The Court has reviewed the Joint Memorandum of Understanding and Release (“MOU”) and finds it just and reasonable. The parties agree and stipulate as follows: The parties have agreed to the MOU, a copy of which is attached hereto. The Court shall have jurisdiction to enforce the MOU, the terms of which are incorporated into this Stipulation and Order as if fully set forth herein. Except to the extent that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the MOU and this Stipulation and Order, the Court hereby dismisses with prejudice all claims of Plaintiffs for relief against Defendant in this case. DONE and ORDERED this 23rd day of July 2024.

s / Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Patrick Braxton, et al.,

Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:23-CV-00127-KD-N

vs.

Town of Newbern,

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AND RELEASE

Plaintiffs Patrick Braxton, James Ballard, Barbara Patrick, Janice Quarles, Wanda Scott, and Dorothy Holley (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or “RELEASORS”) filed this action against the Town of Newbern (“Defendant”). In the Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 75) (“TAC”) Plaintiffs allege that, although Alabama law specifies that all towns must hold elections every four years for the offices of mayor and town alderman, Ala. Code. § 11-43-2(a), (d); § 11-46-21(a), the Town of Newbern failed to hold elections for these positions until 2020. The TAC asserts claims under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (“VRA”), the First, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3). Defendants filed an Answer denying some of these allegations.

Plaintiffs and Defendant (“Parties”), through counsel, have discussed the allegations in the TAC and agree that this action should be settled without protracted, costly, and divisive litigation. The Parties desire to settle fully and finally this disagreement and dispute, and to resolve any and all other disputes or other matters arising out of, or connected with RELEASORS, and the Defendant, Haywood Stokes, III, Gary Broussard, Jesse Donald Leverett, Voncille Brown Thomas, and Willie Richard Tucker’s, (collectively, “RELEASED PARTIES”) positions within the municipal Town of Newbern, including any and all claims or assertions that RELEASORS claim to have, or could claim to have, known or unknown, against any of THE RELEASED PARTIES for any reason, including but not limited to, the claims set forth in the complaints filed by the RELEASORS, or any claim, known or unknown to date, that could have been filed. The Parties share the goal that all future mayoral and town council elections shall comply with VRA Section 2 and the U.S. Constitution.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and promises contained herein, the RELEASORS and RELEASED PARTIES agree as follows: I. STIPULATED FACTS AND TERMS.

1. Newbern is a Class 8 municipality located in Hale County, Alabama. The voting age population in Newbern is 64.3% Black and 34.8% white.

2. Alabama state law requires that the mayor and members of the town council for Newbern be elected at-large at a general election held as provided by law quadrennially. Ala. Code § 11-43- 2(b) (2020). Defendant Town of Newbern is responsible for election administration.

3. From 1965 to 2019, the Town of Newbern did not hold or make any preparations to hold an election for mayor or councilmember, nor did anyone qualify for the positions of mayor or town councilmember. Until 2020, the Town of Newbern had never had a Black mayor, and the majority of prior town councilmembers were white.

4. In 2020, Plaintiff Braxton was the only person who lawfully qualified for any position in town government. Effective July 22, 2020, Plaintiff Braxton became the mayor-elect. All five town council positions were vacant as a result of the 2020 regular municipal election.

5. Defendant maintains that, in 2020, Haywood Stokes, III, Gary Broussard, Jesse Donald Leverett, Voncille Brown Thomas, and Willie Richard Tucker held themselves out to be the de facto mayor and town council and scheduled a special election to rectify Newbern’s past failure to hold elections for town councilmembers. Plaintiffs dispute that the Defendant Town of Newbern and these individuals had the authority to schedule any elections and Plaintiffs assert that Defendant improperly executed steps to notify Plaintiffs and other residents of Newbern about any special elections in 2020.

6. A factual dispute exists regarding who has lawful authority to serve as mayor and town councilmembers and whether any special election held in 2020 was conducted according to Alabama law.

7. Plaintiffs moved for a preliminary injunction requesting special elections in 2024. See Mot. for Prelim. Inj., ECF No. 81. An evidentiary hearing was held. Though this Court found that “Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their substantive due process claim,” this Court declined to grant immediate relief because Plaintiffs did not establish “the element of urgency needed for preliminary injunctive relief.” Order, ECF No. 93, May 10, 2024.

8. Upon the Town of Newbern’s motion to dismiss, the Court dismissed all claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) and ordered the dismissal of all official capacity claims and individual claims previously pled against the de facto mayor and councilmembers but otherwise permitted this action to proceed. Order, ECF No. 95, May 14, 2024. Specifically, the Court held that Plaintiffs stated a plausible VRA Section 2 claim, Anderson-Burdick claim under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, and intentional racial discrimination claim under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. The Court’s order accepted the Plaintiffs’ allegations as true at this stage of the litigation, as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 9. The Defendant Town of Newbern, through the mayor and town council, is responsible for implementing and enforcing the actions described in this MOU, and each party has the power to enter into this MOU. See Dillard v. Crenshaw County, 748 F. Supp. 819, 828 (M.D. Ala. 1990) (citing Tallahassee Branch of NAACP v. Leon County., 827 F.2d 1436, 1440 (11th Cir. 1987)).

10. The Parties agree that Defendant’s failure to administer elections prior to 2020 discriminated against Plaintiffs in violation of the Fifteenth Amendment, Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, and that Defendant violated Plaintiffs’ right to vote under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Braxton v. Stokes, (S.D. Ala. 2024).

Braxton v. Stokes (Braxton v. Stokes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tallahassee Branch of Naacp v. Leon County, Florida
827 F.2d 1436 (Eleventh Circuit, 1987)
Dillard v. Crenshaw County
748 F. Supp. 819 (M.D. Alabama, 1990)