Braxton v. Glazer

97 A.3d 337, 626 Pa. 407, 2014 WL 3714645, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 1885
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 28, 2014·No. No. 69 EM 2014·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2014, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The Prothonotary is directed to strike the jurist’s name from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Braxton v. Glazer, 97 A.3d 337, 626 Pa. 407, 2014 WL 3714645, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 1885 (Pa. 2014).

97 A.3d 337 (Braxton v. Glazer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Com. v. Young, M.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Com. v. Hazzard, R.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Com. v. Castro, C., Jr.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2015