Braxton v. Glazer

97 A.3d 337, 626 Pa. 407, 2014 WL 3714645, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 1885
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 28, 2014
DocketNo. 69 EM 2014
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 97 A.3d 337 (Braxton v. Glazer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Braxton v. Glazer, 97 A.3d 337, 626 Pa. 407, 2014 WL 3714645, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 1885 (Pa. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2014, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The Prothonotary is directed to strike the jurist’s name from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Com. v. Young, M.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Com. v. Hazzard, R.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Com. v. Castro, C., Jr.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2015

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 A.3d 337, 626 Pa. 407, 2014 WL 3714645, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 1885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braxton-v-glazer-pa-2014.