Braxton v. Cook Medical Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Braxton v. Cook Medical Inc.

548 F. App'x 85

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 19, 2013·No. No. 13-2002·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Demetrius Braxton appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment [86] to the Defendant on his employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Braxton v. Cook Medical Inc., No. 1:12-cv-01186-LMB-TCB, 2013 WL 4033654 (E.D.Va. July 31, 2013). We deny Braxton’s motion for appointment of counsel, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Demetrius Braxton appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment [86] to the Defendant on his employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Braxton v. Cook Medical Inc., No. 1:12-cv-01186-LMB-TCB, 2013 WL 4033654 (E.D.Va. July 31, 2013). We deny Braxton’s motion for appointment of counsel, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Braxton v. Cook Medical Inc., 548 F. App'x 85 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

548 F. App'x 85 (Braxton v. Cook Medical Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.