Braxton v. Candler

Supreme Court of Georgia

Braxton v. Candler

37 S.E. 710, 112 Ga. 459, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 196

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedDecember 19, 1900

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 37 S.E. 710 (Braxton v. Candler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Braxton v. Candler, 37 S.E. 710, 112 Ga. 459, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 196 (Ga. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Little, J.

1. A judgment absolute can not be legally rendered against the surety on a recognizance conditioned for the appearance of his principal at a named city court, “then and there to answer to the offense T>f simple larceny as charged in the affidavit of W. W. Tabbott,” when it appears that no indictment or formal accusation was pending in said court against his principal at the time the order nisi to forfeit the recognizance was granted.

2. No legal judgment can be rendered against a surety on a recognizance conditioned for the appearance of the principal to answer to a criminal offense, unless a scire facias has been duly issued and served on such surety, if he resides in the county where issued, at least twenty days before the term to which it is returnable.

3. The court erred in overruling the motion to set aside the judgment.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring, except Fish, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI