Brawley v. State
This text of 815 So. 2d 789 (Brawley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm on all issues raised. As to the specific issues concerning the factual basis for appellant’s plea and the constitutionality of section 776.051, Florida Statutes, appellant failed to preserve these issues for review on direct appeal. See generally Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2); §§ 924.051(4), .06(3), Fla. Stat. (2000); Jones v. State, 708 So.2d 337, 338 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Appellant did not reserve the right to appeal any prior dispositive trial court orders when entering his no contest plea, nor did he subsequently move to withdraw his plea.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
815 So. 2d 789, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6596, 2002 WL 985535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brawley-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.