Brawley v. State

815 So. 2d 789, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6596, 2002 WL 985535
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 15, 2002·No. No. 4D00-2420·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm on all issues raised. As to the specific issues concerning the factual basis for appellant’s plea and the constitutionality of section 776.051, Florida Statutes, appellant failed to preserve these issues for review on direct appeal. See generally Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2); §§ 924.051(4), .06(3), Fla. Stat. (2000); Jones v. State, 708 So.2d 337, 338 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Appellant did not reserve the right to appeal any prior dispositive trial court orders when entering his no contest plea, nor did he subsequently move to withdraw his plea.

Affirmed.

WARNER, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brawley v. State, 815 So. 2d 789, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6596, 2002 WL 985535 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

815 So. 2d 789 (Brawley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hawkins v. State
138 So. 3d 1196 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Binder v. State
853 So. 2d 537 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)