Brawley v. State

791 S.W.2d 712, 303 Ark. 58, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 353
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJuly 9, 1990
DocketCR 90-59
StatusPublished

This text of 791 S.W.2d 712 (Brawley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brawley v. State, 791 S.W.2d 712, 303 Ark. 58, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 353 (Ark. 1990).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner Joe Brawley, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a belated appeal. His attorney, Kent J. Rubens, admits he failed to file a timely notice of appeal pursuant to ARAP Rule 4(c).

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5,1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

The State’s motion to dismiss the appeal is denied. The state’s motion to settle the record and motion for stay of brief time is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
791 S.W.2d 712, 303 Ark. 58, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brawley-v-state-ark-1990.