Bravo v. State
499 So. 2d 71, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11141
This text of 499 So. 2d 71 (Bravo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bravo v. State, 499 So. 2d 71, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11141 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
Opinion
We affirm the adjudication and sentence without prejudice to defendant raising the issue pertaining to ineffectiveness of counsel in a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The remaining point lacks merit. See Mixon v. State, 497 So.2d 720 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Stokes v. State, 476 So.2d 313 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stokes v. State
476 So. 2d 313 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Mixon v. State
497 So. 2d 720 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
499 So. 2d 71, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bravo-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.