Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bravo v. Sauter

Bravo v. Sauter

745 So. 2d 959, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10103, 1997 WL 538794
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bravo v. Sauter. Read the opinion of the Court — 727 So. 2d 1103 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 3, 1997·No. No. 97-1576·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant the motion and withdraw the opinion previously issued.

The motion to dismiss is treated as premature and denied without prejudice to renew after the filing of the record and briefs.

GLICKSTEIN, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bravo v. Sauter, 745 So. 2d 959, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10103, 1997 WL 538794 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

745 So. 2d 959 (Bravo v. Sauter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.