BRAVO FARMS, LLC v. Battin

206 P.3d 655, 165 Wash. 2d 1047
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedApril 28, 2009
Docket82428-2
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 206 P.3d 655 (BRAVO FARMS, LLC v. Battin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BRAVO FARMS, LLC v. Battin, 206 P.3d 655, 165 Wash. 2d 1047 (Wash. 2009).

Opinion

206 P.3d 655 (2009)

BRAVO FARMS, L.L.C., a limited liability company, Petitioner,
v.
Richard BATTIN and Judy Battin, husband and wife, Respondents.

No. 82428-2.

Supreme Court of Washington.

April 28, 2009.

ORDER

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Alexander and Justices C. Johnson, Sanders, Owens and J. Johnson, at its April 28, 2009, Motion Calendar, considered whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is denied. The Respondents' request for attorney fees is also denied.

¶ For the Court

/s/ Gerry L. Alexander CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Somerset Village v. Far Northwest Dev.
206 P.3d 655 (Washington Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 P.3d 655, 165 Wash. 2d 1047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bravo-farms-llc-v-battin-wash-2009.