Bravia Capital Hong Kong Limited v. SL Green Realty Corp., et al.

S.D. New York

Bravia Capital Hong Kong Limited v. SL Green Realty Corp., et al.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 5, 2026·No. 1:24-cv-02296·Unknown

Opinion

□□□□ □□□□ BY) □□ □□ □□□ □□□□□□ □□

Lewis Zirogiannis 214.716.8136 Izirogiannis@mcellp.com VIA ECF February 4, 2026 APPLICATION GRANTED SO ORDERED Hon. John G. Koeltl United States District Judge a bf l; 2 . Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street, Courtroom 14A 4 John G. Koeltl, U'S.D.J, New York, New York 10007-1312 oh > RE: Bravia Capital Hong Kong Lid. v. SL Green Realty Corp., et al. Case No. 24-cv-02296 (JGK) — Filing Redacted Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint and Vacate Judgment Dear Hon. Judge Koeltl: We represent Plaintiff Bravia Capital Hong Kong Limited (“BCHK’) in the above-referenced action and file this letter motion requesting that the Court retain on file the redacted version of BCHK’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint and Vacate Judgment (the “Opposition’). Bravia files its Opposition contemporaneously herewith. The Opposition discusses BCHK'’s last transaction of business in relation to this circuit's “last transaction of business” test to determine the principal place of business of an inactive corporation. See Circle Indus. USA, Inc. v. Parke Const. Group, Inc., 183 F.3d 105, 108 (2d Cir. 1999). As detailed in the Opposition, BCHK’s last transaction of business involved its efforts to purchase a business entity that is a non-party to this action—BCHK’s negotiations with this entity were confidential, and ultimately BCHK did not purchase the entity. Accordingly, BCHK has redacted the name of this entity in the publicly filed version of the Opposition. As a result, and as required by this Court's Individual Practices, BCHK is contemporaneously filing an unredacted version of the Opposition under seal and this letter motion to request permission to retain on file the redacted version of the Opposition. Accordingly, BCHK respectfully requests that the Court allow the redacted version of BCHK's Opposition to remain on file. Respectfully submitted,

Lewis Zirogiannis, P.C. cc: Counsel of Record (via ECF)

01 Los Angeles | San Francisco | New York | Dailas

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

□□□□ □□□□ BY) □□ □□ □□□ □□□□□□ □□

Lewis Zirogiannis 214.716.8136 Izirogiannis@mcellp.com VIA ECF February 4, 2026 APPLICATION GRANTED SO ORDERED Hon. John G. Koeltl United States District Judge a bf l; 2 . Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street, Courtroom 14A 4 John G. Koeltl, U'S.D.J, New York, New York 10007-1312 oh > RE: Bravia Capital Hong Kong Lid. v. SL Green Realty Corp., et al. Case No. 24-cv-02296 (JGK) — Filing Redacted Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint and Vacate Judgment Dear Hon. Judge Koeltl: We represent Plaintiff Bravia Capital Hong Kong Limited (“BCHK’) in the above-referenced action and file this letter motion requesting that the Court retain on file the redacted version of BCHK’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint and Vacate Judgment (the “Opposition’). Bravia files its Opposition contemporaneously herewith. The Opposition discusses BCHK'’s last transaction of business in relation to this circuit's “last transaction of business” test to determine the principal place of business of an inactive corporation. See Circle Indus. USA, Inc. v. Parke Const. Group, Inc., 183 F.3d 105, 108 (2d Cir. 1999). As detailed in the Opposition, BCHK’s last transaction of business involved its efforts to purchase a business entity that is a non-party to this action—BCHK’s negotiations with this entity were confidential, and ultimately BCHK did not purchase the entity. Accordingly, BCHK has redacted the name of this entity in the publicly filed version of the Opposition. As a result, and as required by this Court's Individual Practices, BCHK is contemporaneously filing an unredacted version of the Opposition under seal and this letter motion to request permission to retain on file the redacted version of the Opposition. Accordingly, BCHK respectfully requests that the Court allow the redacted version of BCHK's Opposition to remain on file. Respectfully submitted,

Lewis Zirogiannis, P.C. cc: Counsel of Record (via ECF)

01 Los Angeles | San Francisco | New York | Dailas

Bravia Capital Hong Kong Limited v. SL Green Realty Corp., et al., (S.D.N.Y. 2026).

Pincite

Bravia Capital Hong Kong Limited v. SL Green Realty Corp., et al. (Bravia Capital Hong Kong Limited v. SL Green Realty Corp., et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related