Braverman v. Sentry Insurance
777 N.W.2d 167, 485 Mich. 1079
Opinion
Eric A. BRAVERMAN, Guardian and Conservator of Pamella Jean Smutzki, a Legally Incapacitated Individual, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SENTRY INSURANCE, a Mutual Insurance Company, Dairyland Insurance Company, a subsidiary of Sentry Insurance, and Gary K. Smith Insurance, a sole proprietorship, Defendants-Appellees, and
Auto Owners Insurance Company, Proposed Intervening Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 7, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Braverman v. Sentry Insurance, 777 N.W.2d 167, 485 Mich. 1079 (Mich. 2010).
777 N.W.2d 167 (Braverman v. Sentry Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Cross
777 N.W.2d 167 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2010)