Braverman v. Pierce
757 N.W.2d 103, 482 Mich. 1033
This text of 757 N.W.2d 103 (Braverman v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Braverman v. Pierce, 757 N.W.2d 103, 482 Mich. 1033 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
Eric BRAVERMAN, Conservator of the Estate of Jamall Duffey, a Minor, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Kasiem PIERCE and Amtech Lighting Services, Defendants-Appellees, and
City of Detroit, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 29, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
757 N.W.2d 103, 482 Mich. 1033, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braverman-v-pierce-mich-2008.