Braverman v. Braverman

37 A.2d 57, 135 N.J. Eq. 43, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 384
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 20, 1944
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 37 A.2d 57 (Braverman v. Braverman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Braverman v. Braverman, 37 A.2d 57, 135 N.J. Eq. 43, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 384 (N.J. 1944).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The action of the Vice-Chancellor in retaining the bill until final hearing is a matter that was well within his discretion and is approved.

The order under review is affirmed.

For affirmance — -The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodixe, Doxges, Het-ter, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Ti-iompsox, Dill. JJ. 14.

For reversal — -Perskie, J. 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tidaback v. Rude
46 A.2d 812 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 A.2d 57, 135 N.J. Eq. 43, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braverman-v-braverman-nj-1944.