Brause v. 2968 Third Avenue, Inc.
43 Misc. 2d 691, 251 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1964 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1693
Opinion
While the trial court erred in holding that the termination provision of the lease was a “ condition ” rather than a “ conditional limitation ” (see, generally, Burnee Corp. v. Uneeda Pure Orange Drink Co., 132 Misc. 435; Ehret Holding [692] Corp. v. Anderson Galleries, 138 Misc. 722), the court properly had jurisdiction of the subject matter so as to reach a decision on the merits.
The judgment should be affirmed, with $25 costs.
Concur — Gold, J. P., Tilzeb and Hofstadter, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brause v. 2968 Third Avenue, Inc., 43 Misc. 2d 691, 251 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1964 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1693 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).
43 Misc. 2d 691 (Brause v. 2968 Third Avenue, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Family Showtime Theatres of Bay Parkway, Inc. v. Toys "R" Us-Nytex, Inc. (In Re Family Showtime Theatres, Inc.)
72 B.R. 38 (E.D. New York, 1987)
Grabino v. Howard Stores Corp.
110 Misc. 2d 591 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1981)
Cooper v. Morin
91 Misc. 2d 302 (New York Supreme Court, 1977)
220 West 42 Associates v. Ronbet Newmark Co.
84 Misc. 2d 259 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)
Kirschenbaum v. M-T-S Franchise Corp.
77 Misc. 2d 1012 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1974)
930 Fifth Corp. v. King
71 Misc. 2d 359 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)
Lewis v. Clothes Shack, Inc.
62 Misc. 2d 767 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1970)