Brause v. 2968 Third Avenue, Inc.
This text of 43 Misc. 2d 691 (Brause v. 2968 Third Avenue, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
While the trial court erred in holding that the termination provision of the lease was a “ condition ” rather than a “ conditional limitation ” (see, generally, Burnee Corp. v. Uneeda Pure Orange Drink Co., 132 Misc. 435; Ehret Holding [692]*692Corp. v. Anderson Galleries, 138 Misc. 722), the court properly had jurisdiction of the subject matter so as to reach a decision on the merits.
The judgment should be affirmed, with $25 costs.
Concur — Gold, J. P., Tilzeb and Hofstadter, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 Misc. 2d 691, 251 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1964 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brause-v-2968-third-avenue-inc-nyappterm-1964.