Braunstein v. Commissioner
16 B.T.A. 1330
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Braunstein v. Commissioner. Read the opinion of the Court — 16 B.T.A. 1330 →
Opinion
[1331] OPINION.
Upon the facts disclosed by the record, we are of opinion that the dividends in question in this proceeding were not unqualifiedly subject to the demand- of petitioner in 1923 and that she, therefore, properly reported the amount thereof as income for 1924. Robert W. Bingham, 8 B. T. A. 603; A. E. Potter, 10 B. T. A. 563; Emily D. Proctor, 11 B. T. A. 235.
Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Braunstein v. Commissioner, 16 B.T.A. 1330 (bta 1929).
16 B.T.A. 1330 (Braunstein v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.