Braunstein (Steven) Vs. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided January 16, 2020·No. 80251·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

STEVEN SAMUEL BRAUNSTEIN, No. 80251 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Respondent. JAN 2020 ?ROAN

CLERK OF V-1,:.'R,EME COURT

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL BY S 'YQK-1-1&41, 1 ERK

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion and order for transportation of inmate for court appearance, or in the alternative, for appearance by telephone or video conference and motion for appointment of attorney. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Stefany Miley, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion and order for transportation of inmate for court appearance, or in the alternative, for appearance by telephone or video conference and motion for appointment of attorney, we lack jurisdiction. Ca.stillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

, J.

Stiglich

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947A clefp a - Alci(P cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge Steven Samuel Braunstein Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1447A 441Pilo 2 ..1

1

1.7-•

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Braunstein (Steven) Vs. State, (Neb. 2020).

Braunstein (Steven) Vs. State (Braunstein (Steven) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)