Braunschweig v. Kijakazi

District Court, D. Minnesota·Decided October 31, 2023·No. 0:22-cv-01539·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Shari Braunschweig, Case No. 22-cv-1539 (DJF)

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

Kilolo Kijakazi,

Defendant.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys Fees (“Motion”) (ECF No. 21). Plaintiff seeks attorneys’ fees in the amount of $3,346.50 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) (“EAJA”) (see ECF Nos. 22–23). The Government does not oppose Plaintiff’s Motion or the amount requested (see ECF No. 24). Based on the parties’ agreement, the Court grants Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees and directs the Government to pay $3,346.50 to Plaintiff. In accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), the EAJA fees may be subject to offset or satisfy any preexisting debit that Plaintiff may owe the United States. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 31, 2023 s/ Dulce J. Foster Dulce J. Foster United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Braunschweig v. Kijakazi, (mnd 2023).

Braunschweig v. Kijakazi (Braunschweig v. Kijakazi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)