Brauner v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Brauner v. United States

24 Cust. Ct. 374, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1662

United States Customs Court·Decided February 16, 1950·No. No. 54037; protest 15032A-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners & Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, is subject to an allowance in duties. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners & Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, is subject to an allowance in duties. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Brauner v. United States, 24 Cust. Ct. 374, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1662 (cusc 1950).

Pincite

24 Cust. Ct. 374 (Brauner v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.