Braun v. Stillwater Advance Printing & Publishing Co.

1908 OK 224, 98 P. 426, 22 Okla. 620, 1908 Okla. LEXIS 58
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided November 16, 1908·No. No. 2084, Okla. T.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Williams, C. J.

Since this action was instituted the territory of Oklahoma and Indian Territory have been admitted into the Union as a state, and under the provisions of section 9 (Bunn’s Ed.) of the Constitution, the license of the sale of intoxicating liquors is no longer permitted. Said section provides:

“The manufacture, sale, barter, giving away, or otherwise furnishing, except as hereinafter provided, of intoxicating liquors *621 * * * is prohibited for a period of twenty-one years from the date of the admission of the state into the Union, and thereafter until the people of the state shall otherwise provide by amendment of this Constitution and proper state legislation.”

Abstract or hypothetical cases, disconnected with the granting of actual relief, or from the determination of which no practical result can follow, will not be determined by this court, Harman v. Burt, 20 Okla. 509, 94 Pac. 528; Parker et al. v. Territory ex rel Bostic, 20 Okla. 851, 94 Pac. 175 Freeman v. Board of Medical Examiners, 20 Okla. 610, 95 Pac. 229.

This ease will therefore be dismissed without prejudice.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Braun v. Stillwater Advance Printing & Publishing Co., 1908 OK 224, 98 P. 426, 22 Okla. 620, 1908 Okla. LEXIS 58 (Okla. 1908).

1908 OK 224 (Braun v. Stillwater Advance Printing & Publishing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ham v. McNeil
1911 OK 30 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Albright v. Erickson
1909 OK 79 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1909)
Bachman v. Thompson
98 P. 426 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1908)