Braun v. State of Minnesota

CourtDistrict Court, D. Minnesota
DecidedOctober 24, 2022
Docket0:22-cv-00528
StatusUnknown

This text of Braun v. State of Minnesota (Braun v. State of Minnesota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Braun v. State of Minnesota, (mnd 2022).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Nathan Christopher Braun, File No. 22-cv-528 (ECT/DJF)

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Bayport, and Minnesota Department of Corrections, each in its Municipal Capacity; Paul Schnell, Commissioner of Corrections, Respondeat Superior Capacity; Guy Bosch, MCF-STW Warden, Respondeat Superior Capacity; Victor Wanchena, Associate Warden of Administration, Official and Personal Capacity; CPD Huppert, Official and Personal Capacity; L. McCoy, Official and Personal Capacity; MCF-STW, Municipality,

Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster issued a Report and Recommendation on September 22, 2022. ECF No. 18. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 18] is ACCEPTED; 2. Defendants State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Bayport, Minnesota Department of Corrections, Paul Schnell, Guy Bosch, and MCF-STW, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE from this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; and 3. Plaintiff Christopher Braun’s claims related to his transfer to another prison

facility and alleged assault at that facility, and the alleged impact of that transfer on his ability to meet deadlines in other lawsuits [ECF No. 1 at 12–14] are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.

Dated: October 24, 2022 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Braun v. State of Minnesota, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braun-v-state-of-minnesota-mnd-2022.