Braun v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Braun v. State

37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 318, 1984 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 56

CourtCourt of Claims of Illinois

DecidedNovember 27, 1984

DocketNo. 85-CC-0364

StatusPublished

This text of 37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 318 (Braun v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Claims of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Braun v. State, 37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 318, 1984 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 56 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Raucci, J.

This cause comes on to be heard on the Claimant Carol Moseley Brauns motion for summary judgment.

Claimant’s claim is founded upon an order of a three-judge district court in the northern district of Illinois in the consolidated cases of Rybicki v. State Board of Elections, No. 81 C 6030; Crosby v. State Board of Elections, No. 81 C 6093 and DelValle v. State Board of Elections, No. 81 C 6052. On April 27,1984, the three-judge court ordered that Respondent pay Claimant the amount of $14,903.00 as and for attorney fees as a prevailing party, and to pay National Technologies Unlimited the amount of $50,000.00 for services.

Claimant’s motion for summary judgment seeks an award in the amount of $14,903.00 plus 9% interest per annum pursuant to statute as attorney fees, and the amount of $50,000.00 plus 9% interest per annum for National Technologies Unlimited.

The affidavit of Claimant’s counsel represents that Respondent does not oppose the entry of an order in accordance with the relief sought, and Respondent in fact has not objected to the motion.

It is therefore ordered, that Claimant, Carol Moseley Braun, is awarded $14,903.00 plus interest at the rate of 9% per annum from April 27, 1984, in full and complete satisfaction of her claim, and the amount of $50,000.00 plus interest at the rate of 9% per annum from April 27, 1984, in full and complete satisfaction of the amount due National Technologies Unlimited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raucci, J.

This cause comes on to be heard on the Claimant Carol Moseley Brauns motion for summary judgment.

Claimant’s claim is founded upon an order of a three-judge district court in the northern district of Illinois in the consolidated cases of Rybicki v. State Board of Elections, No. 81 C 6030; Crosby v. State Board of Elections, No. 81 C 6093 and DelValle v. State Board of Elections, No. 81 C 6052. On April 27,1984, the three-judge court ordered that Respondent pay Claimant the amount of $14,903.00 as and for attorney fees as a prevailing party, and to pay National Technologies Unlimited the amount of $50,000.00 for services.

Claimant’s motion for summary judgment seeks an award in the amount of $14,903.00 plus 9% interest per annum pursuant to statute as attorney fees, and the amount of $50,000.00 plus 9% interest per annum for National Technologies Unlimited.

The affidavit of Claimant’s counsel represents that Respondent does not oppose the entry of an order in accordance with the relief sought, and Respondent in fact has not objected to the motion.

It is therefore ordered, that Claimant, Carol Moseley Braun, is awarded $14,903.00 plus interest at the rate of 9% per annum from April 27, 1984, in full and complete satisfaction of her claim, and the amount of $50,000.00 plus interest at the rate of 9% per annum from April 27, 1984, in full and complete satisfaction of the amount due National Technologies Unlimited.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 318, 1984 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braun-v-state-ilclaimsct-1984.