Braun v. Stafford

529 So. 2d 735, 1988 WL 65166
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 29, 1988
Docket88-0622
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 529 So. 2d 735 (Braun v. Stafford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Braun v. Stafford, 529 So. 2d 735, 1988 WL 65166 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

529 So.2d 735 (1988)

Miriam BRAUN, Appellant,
v.
Jane E. STAFFORD, Appellee.

No. 88-0622.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 29, 1988.
Rehearing Denied September 9, 1988.

*736 Thomas A. Dye of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Miami, for appellant.

James D. Dreyer of Dreyer & Associates, Sarasota, for appellee.

HERSEY, Chief Judge.

Appellant, Miriam Braun, one of two defendants in a personal injury action, contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying her motion, made pursuant to section 47.122, Florida Statutes (1987), to change venue from Broward County to Pinellas County. We agree and reverse.

The record indicates that the automobile collision giving rise to the lawsuit occurred in Pinellas County, the responding police officers and fire rescue team were from Pinellas County, the injured parties received some medical treatment in Pinellas County, and two passengers in the plaintiff's vehicle were residents of Pinellas County. The only connection which Broward County has with the case is that the corporate defendant has an office there.

It is clear that Pinellas County is the most convenient forum for the witnesses in this case. Accordingly, here, as in Florida Power & Light Company v. Troutman, 396 So.2d 743 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), and Hertz Corporation v. Rentz, 326 So.2d 216 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976), we find that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion for change of venue. We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ATP Tour, Inc. v. Skoff
758 So. 2d 1226 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Brown & Williamson Tobacco v. Widdick
717 So. 2d 572 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Avis Rent a Car System, Inc. v. Broughton
672 So. 2d 656 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Burger King Corp. v. Koeppel
564 So. 2d 209 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
529 So. 2d 735, 1988 WL 65166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braun-v-stafford-fladistctapp-1988.