Braun v. City of St. Louis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Braun v. City of St. Louis

514 S.W.3d 644, 2017 WL 1149615, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 221

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 28, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104256

StatusPublished

This text of 514 S.W.3d 644 (Braun v. City of St. Louis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Braun v. City of St. Louis, 514 S.W.3d 644, 2017 WL 1149615, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 221 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The City of St. Louis and Ramelle L. Wallace (collectively “Defendants”) appeal the judgment granting Felicia L. Braun’s (“Plaintiff’) motion for new trial following a jury verdict entered in favor of Defen[645]*645dants on Plaintiffs personal injury claim, We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The City of St. Louis and Ramelle L. Wallace (collectively “Defendants”) appeal the judgment granting Felicia L. Braun’s (“Plaintiff’) motion for new trial following a jury verdict entered in favor of Defen[645]*645dants on Plaintiffs personal injury claim, We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

514 S.W.3d 644, 2017 WL 1149615, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braun-v-city-of-st-louis-moctapp-2017.