Braun v. City of St. Louis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Braun v. City of St. Louis

514 S.W.3d 644, 2017 WL 1149615, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 221

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 28, 2017·No. No. ED 104256·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The City of St. Louis and Ramelle L. Wallace (collectively “Defendants”) appeal the judgment granting Felicia L. Braun’s (“Plaintiff’) motion for new trial following a jury verdict entered in favor of Defen[645] dants on Plaintiffs personal injury claim, We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The City of St. Louis and Ramelle L. Wallace (collectively “Defendants”) appeal the judgment granting Felicia L. Braun’s (“Plaintiff’) motion for new trial following a jury verdict entered in favor of Defen[645] dants on Plaintiffs personal injury claim, We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Braun v. City of St. Louis, 514 S.W.3d 644, 2017 WL 1149615, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 221 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

514 S.W.3d 644 (Braun v. City of St. Louis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.