Braun Equipment Co. v. Meli Borelli Associates

220 A.D.2d 311, 632 N.Y.S.2d 549, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10228
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 19, 1995·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered June 9, 1995, which, insofar as appealed from, granted defendant Meli Borelli Associates’ motion to compel arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The only litigation activity of defendant-respondent was the service of routine pleadings, with no more detail than was minimally necessary, and which, under the circumstances, did not constitute particularized assertions of any right to substantive relief. Thus, the IAS Court correctly determined that defendant-respondent had not waived its right to arbitration since it had not "actively participated” in the litigation process and therefore had not "manifested an affirmative acceptance of the judicial process” (Jorge v Sutton, 134 AD2d 573, Iv denied [312] 71 NY2d 807). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Kupferman, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Braun Equipment Co. v. Meli Borelli Associates, 220 A.D.2d 311, 632 N.Y.S.2d 549, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10228 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

220 A.D.2d 311 (Braun Equipment Co. v. Meli Borelli Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SSM Realty Group, LLC v. 20 Sherman Associates, LLC
101 A.D.3d 433 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Ambassador Construction Co. v. 40 Wall Street Development Assoc., L. L. C.
264 A.D.2d 317 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)