Brault v. Logue
This text of 484 S.W.2d 121 (Brault v. Logue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Relator, Mrs. Marie A. Brault, seeks permission of this court to file a petition for writ of mandamus “to require the Judge of the 19th Judicial District Court of Texas to enter a judgment in accordance with the verdict” in a case in which she was a defendant and cross-plaintiff.
Exhibits attached to relator’s motion show that a verdict was received by the court in the case, and that, thereafter, the trial court rendered judgment that relator take nothing. The judgment appears to be a final, appealable one.
While there are circumstances under which we may require a district court to proceed to trial and judgment under Article 1824, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St, we may not ordinarily prescribe the judgment to be rendered, particularly where the judgment rendered may be appealed. See Ogle v. Logue, (Tex.Civ.App., 1966, no writ hist.) 404 S.W.2d 339, and cases cited therein. Relator’s motion does not present an exception to this rule.
The motion for leave to file is overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
484 S.W.2d 121, 1972 Tex. App. LEXIS 2997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brault-v-logue-texapp-1972.