Brauer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brauer v. State

345 S.W.3d 399, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1063, 2011 WL 3586196

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 16, 2011·No. ED 95583·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Adam Brauer appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 Motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Adam Brauer appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 Motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Brauer v. State, 345 S.W.3d 399, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1063, 2011 WL 3586196 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

345 S.W.3d 399 (Brauer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.