Brauer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brauer v. State

345 S.W.3d 399, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1063, 2011 WL 3586196

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 16, 2011

DocketED 95583

StatusPublished

This text of 345 S.W.3d 399 (Brauer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brauer v. State, 345 S.W.3d 399, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1063, 2011 WL 3586196 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Adam Brauer appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 Motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Adam Brauer appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 Motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

345 S.W.3d 399, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1063, 2011 WL 3586196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brauer-v-state-moctapp-2011.