Brauer v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.

49 N.Y.S. 937, 26 A.D. 623
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 25, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 49 N.Y.S. 937 (Brauer v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brauer v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co., 49 N.Y.S. 937, 26 A.D. 623 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We think that it was entirely proper to order a bill of particulars as to the items mentioned in the first and second paragraphs, of the order, hut it seems to us that the items of profit which the plaintiff claims he could have realized on the cattle mentioned in the complaint should not have been required to be stated in the bill of particulars. No sufficient time was given to the plaintiff in which to furnish such bill of particulars, and he should not have been required to furnish a verified bill.

The order should therefore be modified by directing the service of an unverified bill of particulars within 20 days after notice of the entry of the order upon this appeal, and by striking from the order entered at special term the third paragraph thereof. As so modified, the order should be affirmed, without costs to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Buckley v. Franklin Savings Bank
258 A.D. 53 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)
Rhinelander Refrigerator Co. v. Rothenberg
24 F.2d 603 (E.D. Michigan, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 N.Y.S. 937, 26 A.D. 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brauer-v-oceanic-steam-navigation-co-nyappdiv-1898.