Brauer v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.

49 N.Y.S. 937, 26 A.D. 623
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 25, 1898·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We think that it was entirely proper to order a bill of particulars as to the items mentioned in the first and second paragraphs, of the order, hut it seems to us that the items of profit which the plaintiff claims he could have realized on the cattle mentioned in the complaint should not have been required to be stated in the bill of particulars. No sufficient time was given to the plaintiff in which to furnish such bill of particulars, and he should not have been required to furnish a verified bill.

The order should therefore be modified by directing the service of an unverified bill of particulars within 20 days after notice of the entry of the order upon this appeal, and by striking from the order entered at special term the third paragraph thereof. As so modified, the order should be affirmed, without costs to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brauer v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co., 49 N.Y.S. 937, 26 A.D. 623 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).

49 N.Y.S. 937 (Brauer v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buckley v. Franklin Savings Bank
258 A.D. 53 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)
Rhinelander Refrigerator Co. v. Rothenberg
24 F.2d 603 (E.D. Michigan, 1928)