Braudaway v. State
This text of 890 So. 2d 1257 (Braudaway v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Leonard Braudaway challenges his designation as a sexual predator, arguing that the Florida Sexual Predator’s Act1 (“the Act”) is unconstitutional. In support of his argument, Braudaway cites Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review granted by Milks v. State, 881 So.2d 1113 (Fla.2004).
However, this court has addressed this issue in Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla.2003), concluding that the Act is constitutional. Accordingly, we affirm and certify conflict with Espindola, 855 So.2d 1281.
Affirmed; conflict certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
890 So. 2d 1257, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 265, 2005 WL 280325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braudaway-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.