Braucher v. Board of Examiners of Architects

Appellate Court of Illinois

Braucher v. Board of Examiners of Architects

209 Ill. App. 455

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJanuary 31, 1918

DocketGen. No. 23,106

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 209 Ill. App. 455 (Braucher v. Board of Examiners of Architects) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Braucher v. Board of Examiners of Architects, 209 Ill. App. 455 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Architects and engineers, § la*—what does not constitute dishonest practice 6y architect. A single transaction, although consisting of the sale of four sets of plans of two buildings, does not constitute “dishonest practices’’ within the meaning of the Architects’ Licensing Act (J. & A. K 484). 4. Architects and engineers, § la*—when citation in proceeding to revolee architect’s license is insufficient. A citation issued in a proceeding to revoke an architect’s license for “dishonest practices” is insufficient where it fails either to allege a fraudulent intent on his part or to set up facts from which such fraudulent intent may be inferred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Architects and engineers, § la*—what does not constitute dishonest practice 6y architect. A single transaction, although consisting of the sale of four sets of plans of two buildings, does not constitute “dishonest practices’’ within the meaning of the Architects’ Licensing Act (J. & A. K 484). 4. Architects and engineers, § la*—when citation in proceeding to revolee architect’s license is insufficient. A citation issued in a proceeding to revoke an architect’s license for “dishonest practices” is insufficient where it fails either to allege a fraudulent intent on his part or to set up facts from which such fraudulent intent may be inferred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 Ill. App. 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braucher-v-board-of-examiners-of-architects-illappct-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack