Braucher v. Board of Examiners of Architects

209 Ill. App. 455
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided January 31, 1918·No. Gen. No. 23,106·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Architects and engineers, § la*—what does not constitute dishonest practice 6y architect. A single transaction, although consisting of the sale of four sets of plans of two buildings, does not constitute “dishonest practices’’ within the meaning of the Architects’ Licensing Act (J. & A. K 484). 4. Architects and engineers, § la*—when citation in proceeding to revolee architect’s license is insufficient. A citation issued in a proceeding to revoke an architect’s license for “dishonest practices” is insufficient where it fails either to allege a fraudulent intent on his part or to set up facts from which such fraudulent intent may be inferred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Braucher v. Board of Examiners of Architects, 209 Ill. App. 455 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

209 Ill. App. 455 (Braucher v. Board of Examiners of Architects) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Higgins v. License Commissioners of Quincy
31 N.E.2d 526 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1941)