Bratton v. State
This text of 831 So. 2d 1290 (Bratton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We conclude that any impropriety in the court’s exclusion of testimony that the victim engaged in consensual sex in exchange for drugs could not have affected the outcome of the trial. A similar fact witness testified that the defendant had victimized her as well, and her description of the collateral crime was identical to the victim’s description of the crime in virtually every detail. Accordingly, the convictions are affirmed. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
831 So. 2d 1290, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18699, 2002 WL 31840692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bratton-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.