Bratton v. State

831 So. 2d 1290, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18699, 2002 WL 31840692
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 20, 2002
DocketNo. 5D01-2666
StatusPublished

This text of 831 So. 2d 1290 (Bratton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bratton v. State, 831 So. 2d 1290, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18699, 2002 WL 31840692 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that any impropriety in the court’s exclusion of testimony that the victim engaged in consensual sex in exchange for drugs could not have affected the outcome of the trial. A similar fact witness testified that the defendant had victimized her as well, and her description of the collateral crime was identical to the victim’s description of the crime in virtually every detail. Accordingly, the convictions are affirmed. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, C.J., and SAWAYA, J., concur. SHARP, W., J., concurs in result only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. DiGuilio
491 So. 2d 1129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
831 So. 2d 1290, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18699, 2002 WL 31840692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bratton-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.