Bratton v. North Carolina

Fourth Circuit

Bratton v. North Carolina

671 F. App'x 184

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 19, 2016·No. No. 16-2028·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

George Andrew Bratton appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Brat-ton’s motion to assign counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bratton v. North Carolina, No. 5:16-cv-00021-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 81, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

George Andrew Bratton appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Brat-ton’s motion to assign counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bratton v. North Carolina, No. 5:16-cv-00021-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 81, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Bratton v. North Carolina, 671 F. App'x 184 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

671 F. App'x 184 (Bratton v. North Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.