Bratton v. North Carolina
This text of 671 F. App'x 184 (Bratton v. North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
George Andrew Bratton appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Brat-ton’s motion to assign counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bratton v. North Carolina, No. 5:16-cv-00021-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 81, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
671 F. App'x 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bratton-v-north-carolina-ca4-2016.