Bratton v. Clendenin

16 S.C.L. 454
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedNovember 15, 1824
StatusPublished

This text of 16 S.C.L. 454 (Bratton v. Clendenin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bratton v. Clendenin, 16 S.C.L. 454 (S.C. 1824).

Opinion

The opinion of the court __ ivas delivered by

Mr. Justice Richardson,

By tlx* act of 1791, every-witness is allowed 4s. 8d. per day; if from a distance; and but 2s. 4d. if a resident in the town where the court is holden; and it has been long the practice to allow any witness who is called upon without having been regularly subpoenaed, but 2s. 4d. placing him upon a foot-, ing with residents of the place.

A subpoena ticket carries no authority, but is a mere ret • quest made to the witness to attend court. His costs therefore can he taxed at most at no more than 2s. 4d. And the motion is dismissed.

Colcock, Huger, Gantt, and Johnson, Justices, concurrent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 S.C.L. 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bratton-v-clendenin-sc-1824.