Brattle v. Willard

1 Smith & H. 374
Superior Court of New Hampshire·Decided May 15, 1798·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Court

were divided in opinion.

Judge Pickering held the plea a good bar, and Judge Cushing the contrary.

They gave their reasons at length; in substance using the same arguments as the counsel had used.

The cause was, of course, continued till May Term, 1798; when it was again argued, by Mr. Livermore for the defendant, and Mr. Parsons for the plaintiff.

The Court, consisting of Chief Justice Ellsworth and the District Judge, were divided in opinion ; Judge Pickering adhering to the opinion he gave before, and the Chief Justice agreeing in opinion with the former circuit judge.

Judgment according to law was given in favor of the demurrer, and the plaintiff, accordingly, had his execution against the administrator de bonis propriis.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brattle v. Willard, 1 Smith & H. 374 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1798).

1 Smith & H. 374 (Brattle v. Willard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Daimon Von Jackson, Jr.
2023 WI 37 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2023)