Brattle v. Willard
This text of 1 Smith & H. 374 (Brattle v. Willard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
were divided in opinion.
They gave their reasons at length; in substance using the same arguments as the counsel had used.
The cause was, of course, continued till May Term, 1798; when it was again argued, by Mr. Livermore for the defendant, and Mr. Parsons for the plaintiff.
The Court, consisting of Chief Justice Ellsworth and the District Judge, were divided in opinion ; Judge Pickering adhering to the opinion he gave before, and the Chief Justice agreeing in opinion with the former circuit judge.
Judgment according to law was given in favor of the demurrer, and the plaintiff, accordingly, had his execution against the administrator de bonis propriis.
I did not hear the last argument, hut was informed that it did not differ materially from the former, and that Chief Justice Ellsworth delivered his opinion in a very masterly manner, and much to the satisfaction of those who heard him.
Exeter, 10 Nov. 1798. J. S.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Smith & H. 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brattle-v-willard-nhsuperct-1798.