Brattle v. Willard

1 Smith & H. 374
CourtSuperior Court of New Hampshire
DecidedMay 15, 1798
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Smith & H. 374 (Brattle v. Willard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brattle v. Willard, 1 Smith & H. 374 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1798).

Opinion

The Court

were divided in opinion.

Judge Pickering held the plea a good bar, and Judge Cushing the contrary.

They gave their reasons at length; in substance using the same arguments as the counsel had used.

The cause was, of course, continued till May Term, 1798; when it was again argued, by Mr. Livermore for the defendant, and Mr. Parsons for the plaintiff.

The Court, consisting of Chief Justice Ellsworth and the District Judge, were divided in opinion ; Judge Pickering adhering to the opinion he gave before, and the Chief Justice agreeing in opinion with the former circuit judge.

Judgment according to law was given in favor of the demurrer, and the plaintiff, accordingly, had his execution against the administrator de bonis propriis.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Daimon Von Jackson, Jr.
2023 WI 37 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Smith & H. 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brattle-v-willard-nhsuperct-1798.