Bratt v. Midland Asphalt Corp.
8 N.Y.2d 963, 204 N.Y.S.2d 191
Opinion
Judgment reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the evidence in this case created a question of fact as to the nature of the relationship between defendant-respondent and defendant trucker. It, therefore, was error for the trial court to charge that defendant trucker was an independent contractor as a matter of law (Johnson v. B. T. K. Petroleum Co., 289 N. Y. 101). No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bratt v. Midland Asphalt Corp., 8 N.Y.2d 963, 204 N.Y.S.2d 191 (N.Y. 1960).
8 N.Y.2d 963 (Bratt v. Midland Asphalt Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
STERN, RACHEL L. v. EASTER, GUY H.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
Meyer v. Martin
16 A.D.3d 632 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Valdez v. Melba Utica Packing Co.
226 A.D.2d 627 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Lazo v. Mak's Trading Co.
199 A.D.2d 165 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Victor Carrion v. Orbit Messenger, Inc.
621 N.E.2d 692 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
Carrion v. Orbit Messenger, Inc.
192 A.D.2d 366 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Bermudez v. Ruiz
185 A.D.2d 212 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)