Bratle v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.
175 N.E.2d 823, 9 N.Y.2d 870
This text of 175 N.E.2d 823 (Bratle v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bratle v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., 175 N.E.2d 823, 9 N.Y.2d 870 (N.Y. 1961).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs against the Workmen’s Compensation Board to respondent Special Fund; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Claim of McQueen v. New York State Division of Parole
245 A.D.2d 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
175 N.E.2d 823, 9 N.Y.2d 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bratle-v-socony-vacuum-oil-co-ny-1961.